Tuesday, September 6, 2016

Uttara Gita


CHAPTER-I

ARJUNA, after the successful issue of the battle of Kuruksetra, amidst the pleasures of rank, riches, and prosperity, had forgotten the priceless instructions imparted to him by Sri Krishna, on the eve of that memorable battle. He now asks Kesava again to propound to him the secrets of the Brahma-jnana.

ARJUNA ASKED:

O Kesava, [ Kesava means the manifested Logos, the union of Visnu, Brahmã and Mahesvara, or the combined Sattva, Rajas, and Tamas Gunas. The word "Kesava" is from Ka-isa-va] tell me the knowledge of that Brahman that is One, and without its like and rival, without Upãdhi (attributes) beyond the Akãsa, source of all purity, that which cannot be approached by argument, or reached by conception, the unknowable and the unknown, and that which is absolutely free from births and deaths. O Kesava, impart to me the knowledge of that which is Absolute, the only above ode Eternal Peace and Purity, the Instrumental (Nimitta) and Material (Upãdãna) cause of the Universe, though itself causeless and free from all connection. Tell me, O Kesava, the knowledge of that which dwells in every heart, and that which combines the fact of knowledge and the thing knowable in Itself.

SRI BHAGAVAN SAID:

4. O thou long-armed one, thou who art the crest-jewel of the Pandu dynasty, O Arjuna, thou art most intelligent, because thou hast asked me a question which is at once most sublime and magnificent - to attain the knowledge of the boundless Tattvas. Hear, therefore, O Arjuna, attentively what I wish to say on the matter.

5. He is called Brahman, who, devoid of all desires, and by the process of Yoga, sits in that state of meditation in which he assimilates his own Self-mantra (Pranava or Aum) with the Hamsa (Paramãtma).

6. For the human being, the attainment of the state of Hamsa (I am He), within his own limits, is considered the highest jnana. That which remains merely a passive witness between the Hamsa and Non-Hamsa, i.e., the Paramãtman and the destructible portion of the human being, is the Aksara Purusa in the form of Kutasha-Caitanya (Atma-Buddhi). When the knower finds and sees this Akara Purusa in him, he is saved from all future troubles of birth and death in this world.

7. The word "Kãkin" is the compound of ka + aka + in. The first syllable Ka means happiness, the second Aka means misery, and the third In denotes possessing: therefore one that possesses happiness and misery - the Jiva - is called "Kãkin". Again the vowel a at the end of the syllable Ka is the conscious manifestation of Mula-Prakrti or the Jiva form of the Brahman; therefore when this a disappears, there remains only the K, which is the One great indivisible Bliss - Brahman.

8. He who is always able to retain his life-breath (Prãnavãyu) within himself, both at the time of walking and rest, can extend the period of his life over a thousand years.

9. Conceive so much of the manifested Akãsa (sky) as can be brought within the range of one's own mental view, as one undivided Brahman then merge the Atman into it, and it, into your own self; this done, i.e., when the Atman is made one with the Akãsa, think of nothing else - as moon, stars, etc. - in the sky. [ This is the Nirvikalpa Samãdhi - the subjective concentration of the mind, in which both the mind and life-breath become still like a flame without air.

There are two well-known processes of practising Yoga: viz., to concentrate the mind (a) at the point where the nose ends, and (b) where the root of the nose begins. The result in both cases is the same as are the further processes of practice, but in either case the instruction of a Guru is necessary, otherwise it is absolutely impossible to succeed. ]

10. Such a seeker of Brahman, after fixing his mind as aforesaid, and shutting himself out of all objective knowledge (Ajnãna), should hold fast the support of unchangeable Jnãna, and think of the One Indivisible Brahman in the inner and outer Akãsa, that exists at the end of the nose, and into which the life-breath merges.

11. Freed from both nostrils where the life-breath disappears, there (i.e., in the heart) fix thy mind, O Pãrtha, [ another name of Arjuna. ] and meditate upon the All-Supreme Isvara.

12. Think of the Siva, there, as devoid of all conditions of life, pure but without lustre (Prabhã), mindless, Buddhi-less.

13. The signs of Samãdhi are the negation of all positive conditions of life and the complete enthralment or subjugation of all objective thoughts.

14. Although the body of the meditator may now and hen become somewhat unsteady at the time of meditation, yet he is to consider that the Paramãtma is immovable. This is the sign of the Samãdhi.

15. He that considers the Paramãtman as without Mãtra, i.e., neither short nor long in metre, soundless, unconnected with vowels, and beyond the Bindu, (Point) i.e., Anusvara, (which produces a nasal sound), beyond the Nãda, i.e., the voice that rises from the throat, etc., and beyond the Kalãs, i.e., the different phases of this sound, is the real knower of the Vedas.

16. He that has acquired Vijnãna, (the Supreme Knowledge) by the aid of Jnana, i.e.., the knowledge derived from books of Philosophy and instruction from a Guru, and has learned to place the object of this knowledge in his heart, and he that has acquired peace of mind, such a person requires no Yoga for further practice, and no meditation for further conception.

17. The syllable (Aum) with which the Vedas begin, which figures in the middle of the Vedas, and with which the Vedas end, unites Prakrti with its Own Self; but that which is beyond this Prakrti-united-Pranava is Mahesvara.

18. A boat is necessary until one gets to the other side of the river, but when a man once crosses the stream, the boat is no longer necessary for his purpose.

19. As a husbandman throws away the husks, after thrashing out the corn, so does also an intelligent person give up the study of books after he has attained knowledge from them.

20. As light is necessary to find the wished-for object in a dark chamber, but when once the object is found, the light is put aside as unnecessary: so also when the Object of the Supreme Knowledge, that is kept hidden by the illusions of Maya, is once found out by the torch of Knowledge, the Knowledge itself is afterwards put aside as unnecessary.

21. As milk is not necessary for a person who is already satisfied with the drink of nectar, so also Vedas are not required for man who has already known the Supreme Deity.

22. Thrice fortunate is the Yoga who has thus satiated his thirst by the nectar of knowledge; he is henceforth bound to no Karma, as he has become the knower of the Tattvas.

23. He that has known the unspeakable Pranava as the one continuous sound of a big gong, or like one unbroken thread (Dhãrã) of oil, without division and separation, understand the real meaning of the Vedas.

24. He, that uses his own Atman as one Arani (a piece of wood that produces fire when rubbed), and Pranava as the other and constantly rubs the two together, he will very soon see the hidden fire thus produced by the friction of the two, even as he produces the fire that is hidden in the bosom of the Arani

25. As long as one does not see within himself that sublime Rupa which is purer than purity itself, and which beams forth like a smokeless light, he should continue his meditations with a steady mind, fixing his thoughts upon that Rupa (form).

26. The Jîvãtman, although (considered to be) very distant from Paramãtman, is still very near to it; and although it has a body, still it is without body; the Jîvãtman itself is pure, omnipotent and self-evident.

27. Although it (Jîvãtman) is (considered to be) in the body, still it is not in the body; it is not affected by any change of the body, nor does it take part in any enjoyment appertaining to the body nor can it be bound down or conditioned by anything that binds the body.

28 & 29. All oil exists in the seed (i.e., pervading the whole of it) and butter (Ghrta) in cheese (Ksîra, i.e., milk boiled and thickened). As smell exists in the flower, and juice in fruits, so does the Jîvãtman which permeates the whole universe, also exists in the human body. Like the fire hidden in the bosom of wood, and like the air that pervades the whole limitless Akãsa, Atman, the dweller in the caves of Manas, unseen and unperceived, becomes its own expressor, and walks in the Akãsa of the human heart.

30. Though the Jîvãtman dwells in the heart,yet it has its abode in the mind; and though dwelling in the heart it is itself mindless. The Yogî, who sees such an Atman in his own heart through the help of his own mind, gradually becomes a Siddha himself.

31. He that has been able to make his mind entirely unsupported and one with the Akãsa, and to know the unchangeable One, his state is called the state of Samãdhi.

32. Though living upon air he that daily practises Samãdhi to make himself happy with the drink of the Yoga-nectar, becomes able to destroy the destroyer.

33. He that contemplates the Atman as No-thing above, No-thing below, No-thing in the middle, and No-thing all round, his state is called the state of Samãdhi. (That is Nirãlamba, non-supported or self-supported samãdhi) The Yogî who thus realizes the No-thingness of the Atman becomes free from all virtues and vice.


ARJUNA ASKED:

34. Tell me, O Kesava, how Yogîs should meditate upon the colourless and formless Brahman, when the mind is unable to think upon that which it has never seen, and that which can be seen is material, and consequently subject to destruction (change)?


SRI BHAGAVAN SAID:

35. That which is full above, full below, full in the middle, and full all round, is the All-full Atman and he that contemplates the Ãtman thus, is said to be in the state of Samãdhi.

ARJUNA ASKED:
36. Tell me, O Kesava, how the Yogî is to practise meditation when the Sãlamba which thou has just described is unreal and that which is Nirãlamba means No-thingness?

SRI BHAGAVAN SAID:
37. He who, after purifying his mind, contemplates the pure Paramãtman, and looks unto his own Self as he one vast undivided whole of the manifested universe, becomes happy by knowing the Brahman.

ARJUNA ASKED:
38. All the letters have long and short metrical sound, they (letters) are also joined by the Bindu (Anusvãra-point) and the latter (Bindu) when disjoined, merges itself into the Nãda (sound), but where does the Nãda merge.

SRI BHAGAVAN SAID:
39 & 40. Light exists in the voice of the ceaseless Sound, and Manas (thought) in that light; the Space where the Manas disappears (merges in itself) is the Supreme Foot of Visnu. Aiming at the unknowable, where the Sound of the Pranava, led up on high by the Life-Air, disappears, that Space is called the Supreme Foot of Visnu.

ARJUNA ASKED:
41. Tell me, Okesava, when the Life-Breath leaves this body of five elements, and the tenement itself is again reduced to them (the elements), where do the virtue and vice of the man go, and who do they accompany?

SRI BHAGAVAN SAID:
42 & 43. The destiny produced by the result of virtue and vice, the Essence of the five Bhütas - the mind (lower mind), the five senses, and the controlling genii (Devatas) of the five organs of Karma, all these by reason of the Ahankãra (personality) of the mind accompany the Jîva as long as it remains ignorant of the knowledge of the Tattvas.

ARJUNA ASKED:
44. O Krishna, the Jîva, in the state of Samãdhi, leaves all the movable and immovable objects of the world, but what is it that leaves the Jîva so as to remove the nãma of Jîvaship?

SRI BHAGAVAN SAID:
45. The Prãna Vãyu always passes between the mouth and the nostrils; the Akãsa drinks (absorbs) the Prãna (i.e., when the Jïva leaves the body, after acquiring the knowledge of the Tattvas); thus when the Prãna is once absorbed the Jïva does not figure again as Jïva in the arena of this world.

ARJUNA ASKED:
46. The Ãkãsa that pervades the whole Universe also encompasses this objective world. It is therefore both in and out of everything. Now tell me, O Krishna, what it is that is beyond this Ãkãsa.

SRI BHAGAVAN SAID:
47. O Arjuna, the Ãkãsa is called Sünya (vacuum), because it means the want or absence of things or anything. This Ãkãsa has the quality of Sound, but that which gives it the power of Sound (as emptiness cannot produce any sound), thought Itself Soundless, is the unknown and unknowable Brahman.

ARJUNA ASKED:
48. It is evident that the letters are pronounced by means of the teeth, lips, palate, throat, etc.; therefore how can they (letters) be termed indestructible (Nitya), when their destructibility is apparent on their very face?

SRI BHAGAVAN SAID:
49. That letter is called indestructible which is self-pronunciation, i.e., without the efort of any pronunciation, which is neither vowel nor consonant, which is beyond the eight places of pronunciation, which is not subject to long or short accents, and which is thoroughly devoid of the Usma Varnas (i.e, the four letters, S'a, Sa, Sa, Ha, called Usma on account of their pronunciation depending greatly on the help of Vãyu or air - meaning, therefore, subject to no air or breath).

ARJUNA ASKED:
50. Tell me, O Krishna, how, by closing their external senses and knowing that Brahman, which lies concealed in every matter and every substance, the Yogins realize Nirvãna Mukti (i.e., absolute freedom from every kind of bondage)?

SRI BHAGAVAN SAID:
51. The Yogins see the Atman within (them: this they do) when they shut out all their external senses (not by any physical action); for such a person when he leaves his body, his Buddhi [ Students must distinguish between the Vedãntic use of this term and the significance assigned to it in the Esoteric Philosophy. ] (i.e. material intelligence) dies away, and with the death of his Buddhi his ignorance also dies away (i.e., he becomes spiritual).

52. As long as the Tattvas are not known to a person, so long it is necessary for him to practise concentration of mind by shutting out external senses, but once the thoroughly attains the knowledge of the Tattvas he identifies himself with the Universal Soul.

53. From the nine openings (portals) of the body, the waters of knowledge always pass out; consequently one cannot know the Brahman unless he becomes as pure as the Brahman Itself. (Meaning, the powers of mind should be concentrated within, and not allowed to dwell upon external objects through the nine openings.)

54. Thy body itself is exceedingly impure, but that which takes a body (Jîvãtman) is purity itself; he that has known the difference of the real nature of these two never troubles himself with the question of purity; for, whose purity, should he search after? (The Jîvãtman is always pure.)



CHAPTER-II
ARJUNA ASKED:
1. Tell me, Okesava, what is the evidence when one, knowing the Brahman as the all-pervading and all-knowing Paramesvara, believes himself to be one with It?

SRI BHAGAVAN SAID:
2. As water in water, milk in milk and (clarified) butter in butter, so the Jîvãtman and Paramãtman become one in union without any distinction and difference.

3. He who with undivided attention endeavours to unite the Jîvãtman with the Paramãtman according to the manner prescribed by the Sãstras (i.e., Rsis) to him the all-pervading and universal Light shows itself in due time.


ARJUNA ASKED:
4. When, by acquiring knowledge, the knower becomes the object of knowledge itself, then he frees himself from all bondage by the virtue of his knowledge, and what need is there for practice of Yoga or meditation?

SRI BHAGAVAN SAID:
5. He, in whom the light of knowledge always shines forth, has his Buddhi constantly fixed on the Brahman, and with the fire of supreme knowledge he is able to burn down the bonds of Karma.

6. Such a knower of the Tattvas, by the realization of the Paramãtman that is pure as the spotless Akãsa and without a second, lives in it (i.e., Paramãtman) without any Upãdhi (i.e., being free from all attributes), as water enters into water.

7. Atman is Süksma like Akãsa , and therefore it cannot be seen by the eyes, nor can the inner Atman, which is like the Vãyu (air) bee seen either; but he who has been able to fix his Inner-Atman by the Nirãlamba Samãdhi, and has learned to direct the course of his external senses inward, can know the unity of the Atman and Antarãtman (Inner Soul or Mind).

8. Wherever a Jnãnin may die, and in whatever manner his death may happen, he becomes one with Atman when he leases his body, even as the Akãsa in the pot becomes one with its parent Akãsa when the pot is broken, matters not where nor how it breaks.

9. Know by the process of Anvaya and Vyatireka that the Atman which pervades the whole body is beyond the the three states of consciousness - waking, dreaming and dreamless sleep.

[ In the state in which although the material consciousness is absent, still the presence of the Atman is perceived as a witness to that state, this process is called the Anvaya; whereas the ignorance by which the man in the Sthula Sarîra, does not perceive the presence of the Atman, although it is ever-present, is called Vyatireka. This twofold process exists in each of the above-mentioned three states of consciousness.

10. He who has been able to dwell with his mind for one moment on a single point (i.e., to perceive the Light of Caitanya) frees himself from the sins of his past hundred births. [ This probably means that the "vision of the fields of eternity" can never be attained until a person is purified from the "sins" of past births.]

11. On the right side spreads the Pingalã Nãdi (i.e., from the sole of the right foot right up to the top of the head where the Sahasrãra exists),[ For clairvoyant description of the six centres in the human body please see "Chakras" with Illustrations, by C.W.Leadbeater] it is bright and shining like a great circle of Fire (or the Sun); this product of virtue (Pingalã) is called the vehicle of the devas. (Meaning, that those who can fix their mind in this Nãdi, can journey through the sky like Devas; therefore it is called the "Deva-Yãna" or the vehicle of the Devas.)

12. On the left side stretches forth the Ida (i.e., from the sole of the left foot up to the Sahasrãra at the top of the head), the brightness of this Nãdi is comparatively less, like the disk or circle of the Moon; it dwells with the breath of the left nostril and it is called the vehicle of the Pitrs. (Meaning, that those who can fix their mind in this Nãdi, can ascend the Pitr Loka and no further; hence it is called "Pitr-Yãna" or the vehicle of the Pitrs.)

13 & 14. Like the backbone of a Veena, or harp, the long tract of bone with many joints that stretches from the seat right up to the head of a human being is called the Meru-Danda (spinal cord). There is a minute aperture or hole that passes right through this Meru-Danda from the Mulãdhãra to the head; it is through this hole that there passes a Nãdi which the yogis called the Brahma-Nãdi or Susumnã.

15. Susumnã is a fine nerve that passes between the Idã and Pingalã. From this Susumnã all the Jnãna-Nãdis (sensory nerves) take their birth: hence it is called the Jnãna-Nãdi.

[That Nãdi that takes its origin from the Sahasrãra, and growing gradually finer, descends through the canal of the spinal column, is called the Susumnã. At first nine sets of smaller Nãdis spring from it and spread towards the eyes and other organs of sense, etc.: afterwards from each joint of the spinal column to which the pairs of ribs are attached, one on either side, and underneath each rib, there are successively stretched thirty-two sets of Nãdis, with innumerable branchlets covering the whole body like a network; these produce the sense of touch and perform other necessary work requisite for the upkeep of the Sthula Sarîra. These Nãdis are so fine in their texture that if 400 of them be collected and tied together,still they cannot be seen by the naked eye; thou so fine, still they are, like pipes, hollow and in this space there exists a certain substance,like oil, in which the Caitanya reflects; for this reason the Rsis call the Susumnã the parent of all these smaller Nãdis, the Jnãna-Nãdi, and consider it to be just like a tree with its innumerable branches covering the whole of the human body,the root being upwards - at the Sahasrãra - and the branches downwards.]

16. The Sun, the Moon, and the other Devatas, the fourteen Lokas of Bhur, Bhuvar, etc., the ten directions,East, West, etc., the sacred places, the seven oceans,the Himãlaya and other mountains, the seven Islands of Jambu, etc., the seven sacred rivers, Gangã, etc., the four Vedas, all the sacred philosophies, the sixteen vowels and twenty-four consonants,the Gãyatri and other sacred Mantras, the eighteen Purãnas and all the Upa-Purãnas included, the three Gunas, Mahat itself, the root of the Jîvas, the Jîvas and their Atman, the ten breaths, the whole world, in fact, consisting of all these, exists in the Susumnã.

[As all outward objects that are cognizable by the human senses are reflected in the Susumnã Nãdi, therefore the Rsis call this body the "microcosm". For instance,when you see the sun, moon, or the stars, you do not actually go near to them in order to see, but you see them because they are reflected in your Susumnã Nãdi. If your mind had the power to go out of your body, in order to see them, then you would be able to see all and everything that lies in the "Royal Road", and in such a case you would know all and every occurrence that takes place in every quarter of this globe, nay, and somewhere else, in this vast universe.]

17. As various Nãdis have sprung up from the Susumnã, the receptacle of the Inner soul of all Jîvas - and are stretched out in all directions of the physical body, therefore it is considered like a huge tree reversed. The Tattva-Jnãnins alone are able to walk on every branch of this tree by the help of Prãna-Vãyu.

18. In this human body there exist seventy-two thousand Nãdis which admit of sufficient space for entrance into them through Vãyu; the Yogins alone become acquainted with the true nature of these Nãdis by the virtue of their Yoga-Karma.

19. Having closed up the nine portals of the body, and being acquainted with the source and nature of the Nãdis that stretch up and down the seats of the several organs of sense, the Jîva, rising to the state of superior knowledge with the aid of the Life-Breath, attains Moksa.

20. On the left side of this Susumnã, and near the point of the nose, there exists the Indra-Loka by name called Amarãvatî; and the bight luminous sphere that exists in the eyes is known by the name of Agni-Loka.

[Of the nine sets of nerves springing from the Susumnã, at first one set enters into the organ of sight, but it forms into a circle before branching out and entering into both the eyes, this circle is called Agni-Loka. Similarly the circle which the second set of the nerves make before entering into the nostrils, is known by the name of Amarâvatî or the capital of Indra-Loka.]

21. Near the right ear exists the Yama-Loka (the place of death) known by the name of Samyamanî, and on its side exists the sphere of the Nairrta Deva, called by the name of Nairrta-Loka.

[Yama-Loka means the sphere of Death, because there exists such a delicate place near the ear that slight injury is likely to cause death to a person; hence this sphere is called Yama-Loka.

Nairrta-Loka is also called Rãkso-Loka. At the side of Yama-Loka there exists a place the nerves of which enable a person to masticate hard things such as meat, etc.; hence this place is known by the name of Nairrta-Loka or Rãkso-Loka]

22. On the west (i.e., of the Susumnã),and situated in the back, there exists the sphere of Varuna called by the name of Vibhãvarî: and on the side of the ears, the sphere is known as Gandhavatî This is the seat of the Vãyu.

[There is a certain place in the back of a man which the ordinary people of he Hindus touch with their wet fingers at the time of performing the halting ceremony. This place is called Vibhãvarî, because here the nerves are so sensitive, that no sooner one fixes his attention there than he becomes covered with Mãyã and falls into sleep. The term Vibhãvari means night or darkness.

Similarly the place beside the ears, whence the air carries the smell, is called Gandhavatî, meaning the place of smell; the place which starts the air to carry the smell into the nostrils is called the Vãyu-Loka.]

23. On the north side of Susumnã, extending from the throat up to the left ear, and in the sphere of Kubera, known by the name of Pushpavatî, exists the Candra-Loka.

[Kubera is the god of riches of the Hindu Mythology; his place is called Puspavatî, meaning place of golden flowers.]

24. In the left eye and in connection with the Isãnya direction exists Siva-Loka, known by the name of Manonmanî; the Brahmapurî that exist in the head should be considered as the microcosm in the human body (because it is the root and origin of the Jnãna-Nãdi Susumnã, therefore called Manomaya-Jagat, or the world of mind).

25. Like the dreadful fire at the time of Pralaya, the eternal dwells at the sole of the feet; the same all-pure eternal imparts blessing, both above, below, in the middle, in and out (of the body).

[When one dwelling in Susumnã, drinks the nectar of happiness, then whatever obstacles may appear to him both from above, below, or the middle of his body,they instantly disappear no sooner the mediator fixes his mind on the eternal dwelling at the sole of his feet.] [ Referring to the direction of certain magnetic currents. ]

26. The lower portion, or the sole of the foot, is called Atala; the upper portion, or the top, is called Vitala; the upper part of the joint between the leg and foot (i.e., the ankle) is called Nitala, and knee (Jangha) is called Sutala.

27. The lower portion of the thigh (Jãnu) is called Mahãtala; the upper portion of it (Uru) is called Rasãtala, and the loin (Kati) is termed Talãtala. In this way it is proper to know the seven Pãtãlas that exist in the human body.

28. In the Pãtãlas where the serpents live in coils, and below the navel, is the place known by the name of Bhogîndra; this dreadful place, like a burning Hell and Doomsday Fire, is termed Mahãpãtãla; in this sphere, the eternal known by the name of Jîva, displays itself in serpentine coils like a circle.

29. Bhur-Loka exists in the navel; in the armpit [ This localizes a great nervous and magnetic centre that directs every motion of the arms.] exists the Bhuvar, while the Svarga-Loka, with the sun, moon and stars, dwells in the heart.

30. The Yogis realize perfect bliss by imagining the seven Lokas,the Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter,Venus, Saturn, and innumerable other Lokas like Dhruva, etc., in the heart.

31. In the heart (of the person who thus imagines) dwells the Mahar-Loka, the Jana-Loka exists in the throat, the Tapo-Loka between the two eyebrows, while the Satya-Loka exists in the head.

32 & 33. This Brahmãnda shaped Earth [ That is, like the egg of Brahmã.] dissolves itself into Water, the Water is dried up by fire, the Air swallows up the Fire, and the Akãsa drinks the Air in turn; but the Akãsa itself is assimilated in the Mind, the Mind in Buddhi, the Buddhi in Ahankãra, the Ahankãra in Citta, and the Citta in Ksetrajna (i.e., Atman or Spirit).

[Ahankãra here means "self-consciousness", Mahat, or the Third Logos; it corresponds to the Mind in the human principles. Citta means the "abstract consciousness", the Second Logos, corresponding to Buddhi of the human principles. Ksetra-jna, or the knower of the planes, means the Spirit or the First Logos, corresponding to the Atman of the human principles of the exoteric Theosophy. Mind here means the Kãma Mind, and Buddhi means the faculty of ascertaining truth.

According to the definition given by Sri Sankarãchãrya in his Viveka-Chudãmani[ Text in Devanagiri and Translation in English by Mohini Mohan Chatterji. ], the Mind, Buddhi, Ahankãra, and Citta are the four handmaids of Antahkarana; the quality of Mind is to doubt, that of Buddhi is to ascertain, Citta retains or keeps, while Ahankãra, expresses its self-consciousness or shows "I-am-ness". The place of the mind is the throat, that of Buddhi the mouth, Citta dwells in the navel, while Ahankãra resides in the heart.] [ All the explanations in brackets are mere translations, except this portion, which I have simply explained from the teachings of "H.P.Blavatsky" and "Sri Sri Sankarãchãrya ]

34. The Yogins who contemplate me with one mind as "I am he" are saved from the sins collected during a hundred millions of Kalpas.

35. As the Akãsa of the pot is absorbed in the Mahãkãsa when the pot is broken, so also the ignorance-bound Jîvãtman is absorbed in the Paramãtman when ignorance is destroyed.

36. He who has been able to acquire the knowledge of the Tattvas that the Jîvãtman is absorbed in the Paramãtman, even as the Akãsa of the Pot is absorbed in the Mahãkãsa, becomes undoubtedly free from the chain of ignorance, and goes into the sphere of the Light of Supreme Knowledge and Wisdom.

37. If a man practise asceticism and severe austerity for a thousand years, standing on one leg only, he cannot realize one-sixteenth part of the benefit gained by Dhyãna Yoga (meditation).

Those that constantly chant the four Vedas and read other religious works and yet fail to realize "I am that Brahman", they are like the spoons that are used for every cooking operation, but yet remain without a single taste of the foods they prepare.

As the ass bears the burden of sandal (wood), whereby he feels only the weight of the load and not the virtue of the sandal, even so is the case of the (nominal) readers of the many Sãstras, because they do not understand the real meaning of them, but carry them about like the beast of burden.

38. As long as one does not acquire the knowledge of the Tattvas, so long should he attentively perform all good acts, observe purity of body and mind, perform religious sacrifice, and acquire experience and wisdom by visiting sacred places.

39. At the time when the body oscillates backward and forward, the Brãhmana who hesitates to believe that he is Brahman fails to understand the great subtle Atman, even if he be conversant with the four Vedas.

[At the time of practising meditation, when the Susumna commences dancing up and down the spinal cord by the force of the uprising Fire of Brahmã, then the Linga Sarîra within begins to move, which necessarily moves or swings the physical body; if at such a time one fails to consider himself "I am That" his study of the Vedas and Sãstras is simply useless.

Linga is from the word Lîna , which means to unite. As it makes possible the union with Brahman or Atman, therefore it is called Linga; Sarîrã is from the root ISri, I to emaciate, as it emaciates itself with the belief that "I am Brahman" therefore it is called Sarîra. Therefore Linga Sarîrã means that body which emaciates itself and finally enables the Jîva to unite with Atman. Linga Sarîrã is increased by constant talking and other actions, therefore the less is spoken, etc., the better; it is no good increasing the Linga Sarîrã.]

40. Although the cows may be of different colours,but the colour of their milk is one and the same; even so in the case of the Jîva, the bodies may look different, but the Atman is one and the same in all.

41. Food, sleep, fear, and sexual desire men have in common with brutes; it is the addition of knowledge (i.e., the faculty of knowledge of Buddhi) only that makes him a man; if, therefore, he is devoid of this he is but equal to a brute.

42. In the morning a man performs the necessities of life, in the middle of the day he fills his stomach with food, in the evening he satisfies the cravings of his sexual desire, and afterwards falls into the embraces of deep sleep- such is the case with the beasts also.

43 & 44. That hundred millions of Jîva and thousands of Nãda-Bindus [ See the Voice of the Silence by H.P.Blavatsky for the Explanation of Nãda. Bindu is the point where the Nãda ends and is absorbed in the eternal; Bindu, therefore, is the mediatrix, the lady in the Bhãgavata who acted as a go-between between Krishna, the Atmã, and Rãdhã, the Manas. ] are constantly destroyed and absorbed in that All-Purity, therefore the firm conviction that "I am Brahman" is known to be the only cause of Moksa for Great Souls (Mahãtma).

45. Two words bind and liberate the Jîvas respectively, the firm belief of "I" and "mine" (Mama) holds fast and binds the Jîva down, and the absence or want of the same (Nirmama) liberates him from all bondage.

46. When the Mind becomes free from all desires and passions, then only the idea of duality ceases. When there arises that state of Advaita feeling (al in One and One in all), there dwell the supreme Feet of the Brahman.

47. As an hungry person imply wastes his energy in vain when he strikes the air with blows for food, so also a reader of the Vedas and others Sãstras simply wastes his time and energy, if, notwithstanding his study, he fails to realize that "I am Brahman".



CHAPTER-III


1. Sãstras are innumerable, and again it takes a long time to understand their real meaning (even if one succeeds in going through them); life is short, but the obstacles are many; therefore the intelligent should only take the real meaning of them as a Hamsa (swan) separates the milk only out of milk-mixed water.

2. The Purãnas, the Bhãrata, the Vedas, and various other Sãstras, wife, children, and family are simply so many obstacles on the path of Yoga-practice.

[This is not intended either for beginners or for ordinary people; it is intended for those only who have risen very high, i.e., above the world of matter.]

3. Dost thou desire to know all by thy own experience - that this is knowledge, and that is worth knowing, etc., - then thou shalt fail to know the end of the Sãstras even if thine age be over a thousand years.

4. Considering life to be very impermanent, try to know only the indestructible Sat, give up the unnecessary reading of books, and worship Truth.

5. Out of all the beautiful objects that exist in this world, most are intended either to please the tongue or give pleasures to sex: if you can relinquish the pleasures of both these,then where is the necessity of this world for you. (Meaning that these two constitute the essence of selfishness in a man's mind; discard them, and you get rid of the selfish feeling, thereby living for virtue and the good of humanity alone.)

6. The sacred rivers after all are but waters and the idols worshipped are nothing but either stones,metals, or earth. Yogis go neither to the former nor worship the latter, because within themselves exist all sacred places and the synthesis of all idols.

7. Agni or Fire is the god of the twice-born who are given to sacrifice; the Munis call the Atman within them their god, the less intelligent portion worship the idols, but the Yogis see Brahman equally everywhere - both in the fire, within themselves, in idols, and all around.

8. As a blind man cannot see the sun although it lightens the whole world, so those blind of knowledge, or the spiritually blind, also cannot perceive the Omnipresent Eternal Peace that encompasses the whole universe.

9. Wherever the Mind (of a Tattvajnãnin) goes, it sees the Paramãtman there because all and everything is full with the One Brahman.

10. As the serene bright sky is observable with all its panorama of forms, names, and colours, so he who is able to realize the idea that "I am Brahman" - in spite of all forms, names, and colours - alone can see the eternal Paramãtman actually.

11. The Yogi, while meditating, should contemplate that "I am the whole universe"; in this manner he shall see that Paramãtman - the Abode of Supreme Bliss - with the eyes of his knowledge. As long as he shall think of the Akãsa and identify himself with it, so long shall he consider the All-pervading Paramãtman like Akãsa itself, for the Great Subtle Production from the Portal of Moksa, the All-full Abode of Nirvãna, the Eternal Paramãtman dwells in the heart of all Jîva, in the form of the Ray of Knowledge - the Spiritual Soul - in man; this Paramãtman should be known as the Brahmãtman of the Paramãtman-knowing Yogis.

12. He who has been able to identify himself with the whole universe - as the One Brahman - should carefully avoid the desire of eating every man's food and selling all kinds of things.

[There would be no difference between a man and a dog, if he takes impure food and eats every body's bread. Impure trade also destroys the purity of a man's mind.

13. Where the Yogis stay for one second or even half a second, that place becomes sacred like Kuruksetra., Prayãga and Naimisãranya because the thought of Spirituality for one brief second has a greater effect than one thousand millions of sacrifices.

14. The Yogi who considers this universe as nothing but the One Brahman, at once destroys both virtue and vice; consequently for him there is neither friend nor enemy, happiness nor misery, gain nor loss, good nor bad, honor nor dishonor, praise nor blame; all these become alike to him.

15. When a patched-up cloak with a hundred holes in it, is able to keep off the summer's heat and winter's cold, then what is the necessity for wealth and riches for a man whose heart is devoted to the worship of Kesava (Brahman).

16. O Arjuna, the Yogi should not think about or concern himself for his maintenance; if, however, such a thought is necessary at all, then let him beg for alms simply to maintain his body, and protect himself form cold by the clothes of charity; to him diamond and stones, green vegetables and coarse rice, and all other objects in this world, are of equal value (i.e., he becomes indifferent to all).

17. O Arjuna, he who does not covet material objects, never takes birth again in this world.



Analysis of Dhyaana and Nidhidhyaasana.

Dhyaana and Nidhidhyaasana.

Dhyaana is a word quite often used in the Gita and Upanishads but this is generally known as a Yoga vakya (yoga darshana of Patanjali). Nidhidhyaasana is a Vedanta word as Vedanta accepts the path to realization as through Sravana-Manana-Nidhidhyaasana as per Yajnavalkya’s statement to Maitreyi in Brhadaranyaha Upanishad that the Atman should be known through Sravana-Manana-Nidhidhyaasana.

Sankaracharya has mentioned sravana-manana-nidhidhyaasana as the means to realization or brahma saakshaatkara. This has been accepted by none other than Sacchidanandendra Saraswathi (considered to be one of the most faithful to Sankaracharya).

It is in the works of later advaitins that we find the clear mention and definition of sravana-manana-nidhidhyaasana. Even though SS (Sacchidanandendra Saraswathi) and his followers wouldn’t agree to the credibility of these works but the aspect which we are dealing would have to be accepted by SS as well. We also find in the Bhamathi and Vivarana the difference of opinion as to whether the three of sravana-manana-nidhidhyaasana follow one another or one is main & other auxiliary. A brief explanation of the same is found in the Vedanta Paribhaasha of Dharmaraja Adhvarindra. Thus not only later acharyas but early acharyas also gave importance to these three as this was the direct path to atma saakshatkara or jnaana prapthi which couldn’t be achieved through any other means.

We would be referring to the following works for analysis of Dhyaana and Nidhidhyaasana:

1.    Yoga Sutras of Patanjali along with a brief look into vyaasa bhashya, bhoja vritti and sadasiva brahmendra’s yoga sudhaakara – for an analysis of Dhyaana
2.    Vedanta Saara of Sadananda Yogindra along with a look into the commentary of Ramatirtha (titiled Vidvanmanoranjani) and Nrsimha saraswathi (titled Subodhini) on the Vedanta Saara.
3.    Vedanta Paribhasha of Dharmaraja Adhvarindra (unfortunately don’t have any commentaries on the same with me now except one of Ananthakrishna Shastri which is too logical to discuss over here) – though Vedanta Paribhasha doesn’t define nidhidhyaasana but does mention difference on the two schools of Bhamathi and vivarana on the same.
4.    Laghu Vaasudeva Mananam – which is a detailed exposition of advaita Vedanta
5.    Panchadashi of Vidyaranya along with the commentary of Ramakrishna on the same.

(There are many rare works like that of vivarana upanyaasa of govindananda, Vedanta tattva viveka of nrsimhasrama etc. which would have thrown more light on the same but unfortunately all those works are not currently with me in US).

Prostrating the ultimate reality in the form of AMMA, let us first define the two words of dhyaana and nidhidhyaasana. The word Dhyaana is properly defined in the Yoga Sutras. Let us see dhyaana through the sutras & the various commentaries on the same:

The yoga Sutras speaks thus about Dhyaana:
“Tatra prathyaya ekathaanathaa dhyaanam” (Yoga Sutras 3.2)
THERE COGNITION BECOMING ONE-POINTED IS CALLED DHYAANA OR MEDITATION.
Here “THERE” means at the place where dhaarana or fixing of the mind has happened. The sutra previous to this sutra explains Dhaarana as fixing the mind unto a particular place which is explained in the vyaasa bhashya as the various chakras and places in the body (dhaarana is translated as concentration whereas dhyaana is meditation).

Herein is the vyaasa bhashya on the two sutras
“Naabhichakre hridayapundarike murdhni jyotishi naasikaagre jihvaagra ithyevamaadishu desheshu baahye vaa vishaye chittasya vrittimaatrena bandha ithi dhaarana”

Fixing the mind through a vritti alone in external objects or the various places like naabhichakra, hridaya, head (the various chakras popularly known as shad aadharas of the body), tip of the nose, tip of the tongue etc. is called dhaarana.

“Tasmin deshe dhyeya aalambanasya pratyayasya ekathaanathaa sadrishah pravaahah pratyayaantharena aparaamristo dhyaanam”

In those places (where the mind is fixed), having the constant cognition of the dhyeya vasthu alone as if that thought alone exists & untouched by other cognitions is called dhyaana.

Bhoja Vritti on the two sutras is thus:
“tadevam purva uddhistam dhaaranaangatrayam nirnethum samyama sanjnaa vidhaanapoorvakam baahyaabhyantharaadi siddhiprathipaadanaaya lakshayithum upakramathe”

That which was previously hinted and the three antaranga parts of dhaarana (dhyaana and Samadhi) to be defined and through which explanation of samyama etc. which will lead to proposition of the various external and internal siddhis is explained here.

“Tatra tasmindeshe yatra chittam dhritham tatra prathyayasya jnaanasya ekathaanathaa visadrishaparinaamaparihaaradvaarena yadeva dharanayaam aalambaneekritham tadaalambanathayaiva nirantharamutpattih saa dhyaanamuchyathe”

There, in that place where the mind was fixed with a particular cognition and one-pointedness of the thought so that all other thoughts/cognitions are negated, that which alone was cognized through dharana, that alone is concentrated throughout, this is called dhaayana.

There need be no explanation of the commentaries quoted above as they are quite explanative themselves. Here what we have to know is that Patanjali speaks about purification of mind which is removal of the pancha kleshas (of avidya or superimposition as per Patanjali, asmitha or ego, raga or attachment, dvesha or aversion and fear) through yoga anga anushtaanam or performance of the yoga angas or parts of yoga. The yoga angas are eight as we all are familiar with (yama, niyama, asana, pranayama, pratyahara, dharana, dhyana and Samadhi). These eight are split into two – bahirangam and antarangam – external parts & internal parts. The external angas are the five of yama, niyama, asana, pranayama and pratyahara whereas the internal angas are dharana, dhyana and Samadhi. It is quite clear from Patanjali’s words as well through these angas that they are successive. Without stilling the breath through pranayama, it is not possible to concentrate. It is but experience and true that concentration is stronger when the breath is controlled or steady. When the breath is heavy after let’s say running for few miles, it is not possible to concentrate. Thus in order to do dhyaana, it is necessary and essential to have gone through the previous steps of asana, pranayama etc. I do remember reading from vachaspathi mishra’s tattva vaisharadhi commentary on vyaasa bhashya as to that it requires a particular time period of dharana to enter into dhyaana as well a particular time period of dhyaana to enter into Samadhi (sorry that don’t remember now and the book is not with me now).

Thus the dhyaana that we are familiar with can be performed only after asana, pranayama, pratyahara and dharaana. To put it in brief, asana is any comfortable position (preferably sukhasana or padmasana as explained in the various commentaries on the yoga sutras), pranayama is controlling of the prana through breath control, pratyahara is withdrawal of the sense organs from the sense objects (note here that there would be no sense object perception if one achieves perfection of pratyahara and goes to the next step of dharana), dharana and dhyaana being already explained earlier is not being explained here.

Thus it is beyond doubt that the dhyana as per Patanjali’s yoga darshana is something which has lot of pre requisites and cannot be done without the same. It is but interesting to see that Sadasiva Brahmendra (the advaita-yogi that he was) defining the two sutras with respect to Vedanta thus:

“tatra aatmani vaa chittasya bandhah sthaapanam dhaarana ithyuchyathe.
Taduktham yogayaajnavalkye –
Yamaadigunayuktasya manasah sthithiraatmani
Dhaarana ithyuchyathe sadbhiryogashaastravishaaradhaih”

There fixing the mind in the atman is called dhaarana. Thus has been propounded by Yajnavalkya about yoga:
Fixing of that mind which has performed yamaadi (yama and other steps) on the atman is known as dhaarana by saints and knower of the yoga shastra.

Even though this definition in a way harmonizes Vedanta and Yoga through the mention of Atman (against the Purusha of Yoga system), the mention of yaamadigunayuktasya manasah (that mind which has the qualities of yama etc.) emphasizes on the pre requisite processes for dhaarana. Moreover since this definition is quite distinct and different from the traditional yoga commentaries, we cannot take this commentary as such while strictly following the yoga system & their implications.

“Tatra yathokthadeshe pratyayasya ekathaanathaa ekavishayapravaahah, sah cha vicchidhya jaayamaano dhyaanam bhavathi. Taduktham –
Vilaapya vikrithim kritsnaam sambhavavyatyayakramaat
Parishistam cha sanmaatram chidaanandam vichintayet’ ithi”

There, in that previously mentioned place, cognition becoming one-pointed or one vishaya alone passing by, that is achieved through removal of other thoughts and is called as dhyaana. It has thus been explained – “renouncing all other thoughts through all means, whatever remains behind as the atman of the nature of sat, chit and ananda – thinking about it is dhyaana”.

Thus even if we see Sadasiva Brahmendra’s commentary on the yoga sutras, we find that Dhyaana has pre requisite activities without which it cannot be performed. This is quite contrary to the nidhidhyaasana accepted by Vedanta. Before entering into the nidhidhyaasana analysis, let us see dhyaana as interpreted by none other than Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita through a few slokas in the sixth chapter of dhyaana yoga.

The Lord starts the topic of yoga by propounding about asana thus:
Shuchau deshe prathistaapya sthiramaatmaanam aatmanah
Naatyuchritham naathineecham chailaajinakushottaram

A person should sit in a pure place placing the body as stable – the place shouldn’t be too high or too low.

Tatra ekaagryam manah krithvaa yatha chittendriyakriyah
Upavishya aasane yunjyaat yogam aatma vishudhaye

There he should fix the mind by controlling the mind totally after having sat in a particular position – this yoga leads to purity of the atman (from ajnaana).

Samam kaayashirogreevam dhaarayan achalam sthirah
Samprekshya naasikaagram svam dishascha anavalokayan

Having fixed the body & the head, he should avoid movement and be stable (bodily) – then he should see the tip of the nose & shouldn’t see anything else (sankara in this commentary says that the Lord doesn’t mean seeing of the tip of the nose but concentration similar to seeing the tip of the nose).

If we see the above slokas, it is quite clear that the Lord is propounding asana, pratyahara and dhaarana. This seems to be in sync with Patanjali’s definition of the respective yoga angas.

The Lord thus here is propounding the yoga angas in sync with the yoga system. But the Lord at the end of these slokas explains sama bhaavana as if it is dhyaana to be implemented in life & once sama bhavaana becomes natural, it is Samadhi.

Sarva bhootastham aatmaanam sarva bhootaani cha aatmani
Ikshathe yogayuktaatma sarvatra samadarshanah

The yogi, whose mind is controlled, is a samadarshi (one who sees everything as one) as he sees all the beings in the Self and the Self in all beings.

Sarvabhootasthitham yo maam bhajathi ekatvamaasthitah
Sarvathaa varthamaano api sa yogi mayi varthathe

He who sees and worships me in all beings and is established in this oneness, always he is in the present & such a yogi resides in me (as the ultimate reality).

From the above slokas, it is quite clear as to the Dhyaana and samaadhi which the Lord propounds. Dhyaana is nothing but seeing oneness everywhere & the Lord mentions this as “seeing everything in the Lord & the Lord in everything”. This dhyaana is quite different from Patanjali’s Dhyaana as that requires a person to close his eyes and fix his mind in a particular entity. Similarly Samadhi here is knowing everything as being in essence the Lord alone which leads the yogi to be always residing in the Lord. This residing in the Lord is samadhi or absorption which is quite different from what Patanjali says. Patanjali’s Samadhi is not possible while the eyes are opened whereas in Vedantic Samadhi, eyes can be open.

To conclude the discussion about dhyaana, the dhyaana which Patanjali propounds is quite different from Vedantic dhyaana which is termed in Vedanta as nidhidhyaasana (instead of dhyaana). Let us now try to see sravana-manana-nidhidhyaasana as defined in some of the basic works of Vedanta.

VEDANTA SAARA OF SADANANDA YOGINDRA

Evam bhoothasvasvaroopachaitanyasaakshaatkaara paryantham sravana manana nidhidhyaasana saamadhyanushtaanasya apekshitattvaat te api pradarshayanthe |

After propounding the nature of entities in the world, since it requires following of sravana-manana-nidhidhyaasana-samadhi, therefore they are being explained here.

SRAVANA

Sravanam naama shadvidhalingaih asheshavedantaanaam adviteeya vasthuni tatparya avadhaaranam |

Sravana is determining the essence/import of all scriptures through the shad lingas (six lingas) as adviteeya Brahman.

Lingaani tu upakrama upasamhaara abhyaasa apoorvathaa phalam arthavaada upapatti aakhyaani |

The six lingas are thus:
  1. Upakrama and upasamhaara – beginning and end
  2. abhyaasa – repetition
  3. apoorvatha – newly mentioned or not mentioned elsewhere
  4. phalam – fruit
  5. arthavaada – praising through mentioning of good obtained by following or bad obtained by not-doing.
  6. Upapatti – analogies and logic

The above six have been dealt in other threads & in order to keep the work short, those are not being dealt over here.

MANANA
Mananam tu sruthasya adviteeyavasthuno Vedanta anugunayukthibhih anavaratham anuchinthanam

Manana is using logic accepted by Vedanta again and again to confirm the presence/tenability of the adviteeya vasthu which has been heard through sravana.

NIDHIDHYAASANA
Vijaatheeyadehaadipratyaya rahitha adviteeyavasthu sajaatheeya pratyayapravaaho nidhidhyaasanam

Devoid of the cognitions of the distinct body and other objects & having a flow of constant cognition of the adviteeya vasthu (non-dual reality of Brahman).

SAMAADHI
Samadhirdvividhah savikalpako nirvikalpaschethi

Samadhi is of two types – savikalpa and nirvikalpa.

Tatra savikalpako naama jnaatrajnaaanadivikalpalayaanapekshayaa adviteeya vasthuni tadaakaara aakaarithayaah chitta vritteh avasthaanam

Savikalpa is wherein the mind is contemplating on the adviteeya vasthu by having the vritti of adviteeya Brahman & wherein the differences of triputi is not there (is there but known as unreal).

Tadaa mrinmayagajaadhibhaane api mridbhaanavad dvaita bhaane advaitam vasthu bhaasathe |

There even as in an elephant made of mud, mud alone shines & is seen, similarly even though dvaita may be perceived, advaita vasthu alone shines (advaita alone is seen).

Nirvikalpakasthu Jnaatrajnaanadivikalpalayaapekshayaa adviteeya vasthuni tadaakaara aakaarithyaah chittavritteh athitharaam ekibhaavena avasthaanam |

Nirvakalpa is wherein there is no difference of knower & knowing, chitta vritti is removed & merging of the seeker unto the adviteeya vasthu happens (adviteeya vasthu alone exists).

Tadaa tu jalaakaarakaritha lavana anavabhaasena jalamaatravabhaasavad adviteeya vasthu aakaarakaaritha chittavritti anavabhaasena adviteeyavasthu maatram avabhaasathe |

There even as when salt merges in water, salt doesn’t exist & water alone exists – similarly when adviteeya vasthu vritti is not there, adviteeya vasthu alone shines (when even the thought or contemplation of the non-dual reality vanishes).

EXPLANATION
If we see the example of mud-elephant given by Sadaananda, it is quite clear that the Samadhi which Vedanta accepts is not the same as Patanjali’s Samadhi. In order to go beyond the dvaita or in order to see advaita in dvaita, what is required is nidhidhyaasana in the form of seeing everything as one. Thus the nidhidhyaasana which he propounded as constant flow of the thought of the ultimate reality is in fact not the same as dhyaana as here it is not essential to not indulge in the worldly activities. It is but a fact and matter of experience that there can be one constant thought maintained in the mind even while worldly activities are performed. This is seen in the case of a lover who does all activities but always thinks about his love. The same is the case with a drama artist who performs all activities but still remains a mere witness to all those activities. Thus following nidhidhyaasana is in fact becoming a sakshi to all activities. This (sakshi or kutastha or witness-hood) has been explained in depth through logic by Vidyaranya in Chitra Deepa and Kutastha Deepa of Panchadashi.

Ramateertha doesn’t comment in depth on nidhidhyaasana but does give few comments on Samadhi which are more or less explanations of the analogies. Even though Ramateertha mentions that savikapa and nirvikalpa is what sampradaaya mentions as samprajnaata and asamprajnaata (both terms are terms used by Patanjali), it is but true that Patanjali’s yoga system also bases itself on the scriptures. The scriptures do speak about a Samadhi wherein triputi is still there & a Samadhi where triputi vanishes (the former being samprajnaata and the later being asamprajnaatha). Thus there is no scope of doubt regarding the difference between yoga and Vedanta in this case.

Rama teertha comments thus about the analogy of mud-elephant:

Yathaa mridvikaare gaje kumbhakaaraadinirmithe gajoyamithi asyaam buddhau gajaakaara ullekho api mrinmaatrameva satyam bhaasathe gajaakaarasya mithyaatvanischayaat evam brahmaakaaram vritthau jnaatraadhyaakaare ullikhyamaane api brahmaiva satyam bhaasathe na jnaatradivikalpo ithyarthah

As in the modification of mud which is an elephant, the elephant is made out of mud etc. is known & thereby even if it is mentioned that this is an elephant-form of mud, it is known that mud alone exists as real because of knowing the elephant-form as an illusion – similarly in the modification of the mind with Brahman-thought, the various differences of triputi (knower, knowledge and known object) is mentioned, it is known that brahman alone really exists as no triputi exists at all.

From the above explanation as well as the words of Sadananda Yogindra, it is quite clear that the nidhidhyaasana which Vedanta accepts is not the same as dhyaana of Yoga system.

LAGHU VAASUDEVA MANANAM

Let’s now see sravana-manana-nidhidhyaasana as defined by Laghu Vasudeva Mananam (we will see the entire explanation of sravana-manana-nidhidhyaasana which is quite exhaustive).

Evam aatmasvaroope prasiddhe gurunaa upadishyamaane api prathibandhakatrayena na nischayo bhavathi |

Thus even though the nature of the Atman is well-known (famous), still due to the three obstacles (which will be mentioned) the nature is not clearly known.

Prathibandhakatrayam cha samshayabhaavana asambhaavana vipareethabhaavana chethi |

The three obstacles are: samshaya (doubt), asambhaavana (impossibility) and vipareethabhaavana (contrary thoughts).

Rigaadishaakhaasu upadishyamaanam upanayaadikarma yathaa anekavidham tathaa rigaadishaakasu upadhishyamaanam aatmatattvam api anekaprakaaram vaa na vaa ithi samshayah samshayabhaavana |

Samshayabhaavana is having doubts as to whether the Self is one or different in the various shaakhas of the scriptures even as the ritualistic karmas like upanaya etc. are different in the different shaakhas (recension of a particular Veda is called shaakha).

Saa sakalavedanta taatparya avadhaarana roopasravanena nashyathi |

Samshaya bhaavana is removed through sravana which is knowing the essence/import of all scriptures.

Evam sarveshaam vedanthaanaam advaitabrahmani eva taatparyamithi sravanena pramaanavishaye samsheye nashte api, idam dvaitam katham sambhaavyathe satyatvena pratheeyamaaneshu jeeveshwarajagatsu bhinneshu satsvapi buddhih asambhaavana |

Even though the doubts regarding the praamana vishaya (object of the scriptural knowledge) and knowing through sravana that advaita Brahman alone is the import of all scriptures, this duality which is perceived as the difference between ishwara, jeeva and jagat, how this can be wrong as it is experienced as real – this is asambhaavana (impossibility).

Iyam svapna dristaanthaadiroopayukthyaatmaka mananena nashyathi |

Asambhaavana is removed through manana which is usage of various yukthis like svapna dristhaantha (analogy of svapna) etc.

Evam sravane manane cha krithe api anaadhyavidhyaavaasanayaa sarvasyaapi jagatho yathaapoorvam satyatvaprathithih vipareetha bhaavana |

Even after sravana and manana, the experience of the world as real due to the vasanas caused by beginningless ignorance is called vipareetha bhavana.

Saa brahmaikaakaara prathyayapravaaharoopa nidhidhyaasanena nashyathi |

Vipareetha bhaavana is removed through constant cognition in the form of one Brahman at all times which is nidhidhyaasana.

If we see the explanation of nidhidhyaasana above, it is brahma eka aakaara prathyaya which means cognition in the form of Brahman alone. This means that there can be other cognitions but that also has to be cognized as Brahman alone or brahma aakaara alone even as the elephant-mud analogy was explained.

Thus laghu vasudeva manana also clearly shows nidhidhyaasana as not the dhyaana of Patanjali.

PANCHADASI OF VIDYARANYA

Let us lastly see vidyaranya’s Panchadasi regarding sravana-manana-nidhidhyaasana.

Vidyaranya thus says in the tattvaviveka prakaranam (1.53):

Ittham vaakyaih tadartha anusandhaanam sravanam bhaveth |
Yukthyaa sambhaavithatva anusandhaanam mananam tu tat ||

Thus knowing the mahavakyas like ‘tat tvam asi’ through contemplation of their meaning is sravana or listening.

Reflecting or manana is contemplation of the “possibility” of the mahavakya through logic.

Taabhyaam nirvichikitse arthe chethasah sthaapithasya yat |
Ekathaanatvam etat hi nidhidhyaasanam uchyathe ||

Fixing the mind unto the meaning of the mahavakyas beyond doubt is called nidhidhyaasana characterized by one-pointed concentration.

Ramakrishna while commenting on the above says thus:
Vaaikyaihi tattvamasyaadivaakyaih tadartha anusandhaanam teshaam vaakyaanaam arthasya jeevabrahmanorekatvalakshanasya anusandhaanam sravanam bhaveth |

Of the words like tattvamasi, contemplation on their meaning which is knowing the words as having the characteristics of identity of jeeva and Brahman is sravanam.

Yukthyaa granthasandarbhena ukthaprakaarena sambhaavithatva anusandhaanam sruthasya arthasya upapapadhyamaanatvajnaanam yadasthi tattu mananam ithi uchyathe |

Through logic, of whatever has been explained till now, contemplation of the possibility of whatever has been heard till now & logicality of the same – is achieved through which knowledge that is known as manana or reflection.

Taabhyaam sravanamananaabhyaam nirvichikitse nirgathaa vichikithsaa samshayo yasmaadasau nirvichikitsah, tasmin arthe vishaye sthaapithasya dhaaranaavathah chethasah ‘desha bandhaschittasya dhaaranaa’ ithi patanjalinokthatvaadi ekathaanatvam ekaakaaravritti pravaahatvam etat nidhidhyaasanam uchyathe |

hi prasiddham yogashaastre ‘tatra prathyaya ekathaanathaa dhyaanam’ ithi |

Of those two words, which has been heard & reflected, which is without any doubts, contemplation on their meaning or the vishaya put forth by them by fixing the mind unto them even as patanjali has explained and having a one-pointed concentration or constant flow of one thought alone is nidhidhyaasana or contemplation.

The word ‘hi’ used is to show that this is quite famous in the yoga shaastra as dhyaanam.

Even though the words of Vidyaranya and the commentary of his disciple Ramakrishna on the same point towards the yoga system of Patanjali but still it is only a comparison to the similarity between dhyaana and nidhidhyaasana. The similarity between both is that they include constant flow of a single thought. If we analyze directly as to the dhyeya (object of meditation) of Yoga and Vedanta, the difference can be easily understood. Yoga emphasizes on dhyaana of any entity as such which will in turn lead to Samadhi. Samadhi which is divided into Samadhi of gross objects & subtle thoughts leads finally to nirbheeja Samadhi or that Samadhi wherein there is no thought or vasana left. On the other hand, Vedanta emphasizes on the dhyeya of brahma-atma aikya. As Vidyaranya explains dhyaana as contemplating on the confusion-less meaning of the mahavakya which is brahma-atma aikya, the difference between dhyaana of yoga and nidhidhyaasana of Vedanta is quite evident.

Thus Vidyaranya’s words and Ramakrishna’s explanation using Yoga sutras of Patanjali should be understood to point out the similarity between the basic essence of dhyaana of Yoga and nidhidhyaasana of Vedanta – it is wrong to consider this as equating dhyaana and nidhidhyaasana.

Thus all the Vedanta acharyas explain nidhidhyaasana or rather the Vedantic means of sravana-manana-nidhidhyaasana as different & distinct from the Yoga means of ashta anga (eight limbs of yama, niyama, asana etc.).




Dhyaana of Yoga and Nidhidhyaasana of Vedanta - Differentiated

Last but not the least let us see in brief the reasons as to why dhyaana and nidhidhyaasana cannot be one and the same.

1.    Dhyaana of the Yoga system has prerequisites which include asana, pranayama etc. whereas nidhidhyaasana or contemplation has no restrictions/prerequisites – thus dhyaana has to be done in a flat surface on a piece of cloth with back straight etc. whereas nidhidhyaasana can be done at any time, at any place, in any particular way.
2.    Dhyaana has its own bad effects if the person is disturbed from it (it can even lead to death) whereas nidhidhyaasana has no bad effects because it has no limitations. We have to consider this in the same case as with jnaana which has no limitations and karma (rituals) which has n-number of limitations.
3.    Dhyaana leads to Samadhi which is finally nirbheeja samaadhi (similar to Nirvikalpa Samadhi of advaita) whereas nidhidhyaasana leads to Sahaja Samadhi (natural-absorption state which is the real Samadhi beyond all distinctions – jeevan mukthi as per advaita).
4.    Dhyaana doesn’t remove bhedha or duality which is the cause of all sorrows but only leads to isolation of the jeeva (purusha as per Yoga system) from the prakrithi (which includes its effects of the world in general). Nidhidhyaasana is following of oneness everywhere through the knowledge that everything is but Brahman alone, thus nidhidhyaasana removes duality (negates duality through the knowledge that duality is not real but only illusory).
5.    Dhyaana is karma whereas nidhidhyaasana is jnaana. Karma is karthutantra (as Sankara puts it in his Brahma Sutra Bhashya) whereas jnaana is vasthutantra. Karthutantra is that which has the option of “karthum, akarthum and anyathakarthum” (doing, non-doing and doing in a different way respectively) whereas vasthutantra is knowledge of an entity which is either known or unknown. A person who has a pot in front of him perceives the pot – he doesn’t have an option of whether to perceive or not. A person has control over whether to do dhyaana or not to do – he also can decide as to how it can be done which has led to n-number of dhyaana sadhanas propagated by different saints (art of living, kriya yoga of paramahamsa yogananda etc.). A person doesn’t have any control over nidhidhyaasana because once a person goes through reflection, then by default nidhidhyaasana happens – he cannot decide on it. Once a person hears about the reality, reflects it and becomes clear about it, nidhidhyaasana automatically happens whether he wants or not.
6.    Modes of dhyaana are many whereas nidhidhyaasana is one alone as per Advaita.

There can be more reasons pointed out to prove that dhyaana is not the same as nidhidhyaasana but in order to keep it short and not confusing, we will stop over here.

CONCLUSION


Thus it can be concluded beyond doubt that dhyaana is not the same as nidhidhyaasana. Dhyaana is only considered a sadhana for a spiritual seeker whereas nidhidhyaasana is not a sadhana but an inevitable step to realization. Thus wherever Sankara or any of the advaita acharyas use the word dhyaana, we have to understand it not as the dhyaana of yoga system but as nidhidhyaasana alone unless the context is such that dhyaana of yoga system alone is pointed out.

A Brain in a Vat - Philosophical Thought

  A Brain in a Vat " A Brain in a Vat" is a philosophical thought experiment that explores fundamental questions about knowledge, ...